Which premise of a claimed entitlement is supported?
Element · Relation · Boundary
Party, claim, document, rule and review point are distinct. Alleged facts have a source and review status. Contract content, validity and interpretation differ and must not collapse into one “proven” edge.
Effect · Time · Feedback
A conditional “if A and B, then C” can show derivation structure. Rule validity, term interpretation and evidence of A/B still need review. Logical form does not guarantee a norm’s current applicability. AdLegal organises these parts and missing evidence.
(A ∧ B) → C A, B ∴ CValid inference given satisfied premises. Their legal and factual satisfaction requires separate professional review. This claims no specific legal outcome.
Limits of the claim
No legal advice, automatic legal assessment or computed statutory deadline. You must verify sources and dates.
Test
Give a case to an independent professional. Can they distinguish claim, reference and open premise? Falsely confirmed evidence is a data defect, not a proof resolved by design.