epoch.
Back · Discover
ADL / CASE

Philosophy

ADL may be read as a metamodel perspective: investigate identity, relations, change, boundary and scale. This is not yet a full epistemology, ontology or normative ethics.

What does a description explain, and what does it assume?

Element · Relation · Boundary

Object, statement and evidence are distinct units. The metamodel helps separate them. A definition fixes usage; an empirical claim asserts something about the world. Moving from what is to what ought requires a normative premise.

Effect · Time · Feedback

Recursive viewing combines relational description with scale changes. System thinking similarly separates system/environment, cybernetics examines feedback and process thinking examines change. Similarity proves neither ADL priority nor refutation. A possible contribution is consistent, usable representation of these questions across applications.

Formal representationdefinition ≠ empirical claim ≠ proof ≠ practical utility

The symbols distinguish statement types, not a new formal logic.

Limits of the claim

A metalanguage becomes empty if every observation fits without fixed criteria. Criticism must be able to target a definition, assumption or inference.

Test

Select a central claim and classify it. A critic must be able to give a counterexample without terms merely shifting afterwards.